Monochrome Madness,  Photographic techniques

Gallery: as bright as can be (in black and white)

Paul Simon, Kodachrome

Sometimes when I take a photo I know that it will look better in monochrome. Nevertheless I always shoot in colour to give me options (and because I feel I get a better ‘look’ post-editing with Nik Silver Efex than I do with my in-camera settings). On other occasions I take a photo in colour and realise that it will look better in black and white, or perhaps that it will look as good but different.

Sometimes though the colour IS the subject and I wouldn’t dream of converting it – or would I?! That’s the Monochrome Madness challenge set us by Margaret this week. Can we make a strikingly colourful photo look as arresting in black and white? Or is that indeed madness?!

For this exercise I tried to select photos that I felt would work even when their colour is removed. The secret to a successful monochrome conversion of a vivid colour photo, I would argue, is that the image must be not only colourful but also have a lot of contrast. That is necessary if it is to remain striking when the colours are stripped out. Texture is also helpful in retaining impact when colour is gone.

I’m using the ‘image compare’ block for landscape orientated shots, and columns for the portrait orientated ones. Use the slider to see the original bright colours and judge for yourself if the monochrome versions are successful. Let me know in the comments which ones you think work, and of course which ones don’t.

And my own view? I reckon most of these shots look better in the original colour, but that doesn’t mean that many of them don’t look interesting in monochrome too.

My feature photo was taken in Sagada, Philippines, and edited with Photoshop Elements to create the ‘half and half’ effect

Near the Peace Pagoda, Pokhara, Nepal


Bougainvillea in Monteverde, Costa Rica


Hibiscus, Marsaxlokk, Malta


Peacock, Wilpattu National Park, Sri Lanka


In Selvatura Park, Costa Rica


Lilac-breasted Roller, Chobe National Park, Botswana


Little Bee-eaters, Souimanga Lodge in the Sine-Saloum Delta, Senegal

You may remember these Little Bee-eaters from my recent ‘B’ post; I thought it would be fun to include them in this one too!


Sunset from Lagarta Lodge, Costa Rica


Sunset by the Narayani River, Chitwan National Park, Nepal


Part of the Taj Mahal complex, Agra, India


In Jaisalmer, Rajasthan, India


In Narlai, Rajasthan, India


Roof detail Sanjusangen-do, Kyoto, Japan


Fishing boat in Marsaxlokk, Malta

36 Comments

    • Sarah Wilkie

      Thank you Maggie 🙂 As Anabel said below ‘sunsets are no longer sunsets with their colour stripped’ but they can still work as images, just with the ‘different personalities’ you mention!

  • Steven and Annie Berger

    I’ve never seen pictures like these where you can adjust the slider. Quite fascinating. I very rarely reread a post but I found myself doing just that with this one. You certainly got me thinking.
    Thanks,
    Steve

    • Sarah Wilkie

      Thank you very much Steve 😊 That slider is a clever WordPress block called ‘image compare’. It works best (imho) when you have photos like this that are the same size, proportions etc., but with a different edit. I’ve played with it a few times and I do find it effective for certain posts like this one. Glad I got you thinking!

  • Egídio

    This was very revealing to my eyes. I must confess that all the bird photos were more appealing to me in color. Excellent gallery overall!

    • Sarah Wilkie

      It’s one of my favourite birds and that shot is one of my favourite shots 😀 This is the first time I’ve tried a monochrome version. I prefer the colour because that’s what makes the bird so special, but because of the textures in the branch I think it does still work in B&W.

  • Vicki

    In general, I think colour works better for flowers and I love the vibrant colour of those turbans too.

    I’m a big fan of monotone in any shade – Black and White or Sepia.

    Architectural details often work better in Black and White. Landscapes can be either. Depends on the skill of the photographer or his photo editing. And of course it depends on the viewer too. We all have preferences for one or the other (or both colour and monotone). I always shoot in colour and JPEG, but that’s partly because I don’t have the eyesight for lots of photo editing, just the basic tweaks and I generally take many photos (in the past) and don’t wish to spend time on too much editing in RAW.

    • Sarah Wilkie

      Thank you for the detailed comment Vicki 🙂 I shoot in JPEG too, mainly out of habit as I do often spend time editing – however I don’t want to invest that time in more shots than I have to and with JPEG some images work straightaway!

  • Suzanne

    I think you’ve highlighted that nature is more appealing in colour with the exception of wild seas and contrasting landscapes though people and objects are more dramatic in B&W.

    • Sarah Wilkie

      That’s an interesting idea Suzanne, thank you 🙂 I’m sure there are exceptions to that ‘rule’ but as a general point I can see what you’re getting at. Personally however I feel that nature CAN provide images that look good in B&W – you just have to pick the right ones!

  • Heyjude

    I’m afraid I prefer all in colour. The portraits of the men are successful in black and white, but when you see the wonderful red turbans, colour is the winner. And a sunset just isn’t a sunset without colour. But I enjoyed the comparisons.

    • Sarah Wilkie

      Glad you at least enjoyed the comparisons Jude 🙂 I seem to remember that you’re not a big fan of black and white photography – is that right? Or is it simply that having seen the colour versions you miss that vibrancy in the mono ones?

      • Heyjude

        I do like black and white photos, but having the colour version in your examples made me prefer them. Some flowers work well if they are architectural, and buildings and street photography. But vibrant colours are hard. And those birds need their colour.

  • Anne Sandler

    This is a great post of comparisons Sarah. I liked the people portraits better in monochrome because you can see more depth in their faces, how living life has affected them. While the birds do look better in color, they don’t look bad in monochrome, with one exception–the peacock. I think your Taj Mahal image looked better in mono since it accented the texture of the building more. The decision on the fishing boat depends on what interpretation you want us to take away. The mono has it looking more weathered and used, the color shows more vibrancy, less weathered and still used.

    • Sarah Wilkie

      Thanks so much Anne 😊 I’m inclined to agree about the people portraits – there’s so much character in those faces. And also the Taj Mahal one – the mono version brings out the texture as you say and also makes more of the symmetry I felt. Plus the figure stands out a little more. You’re spot on about the fishing boat – you really do get a different impression of it depending on which version you look at.

  • restlessjo

    Yes, the slide feature works well for this, Sarah. I had the feeling that you could have gone on and on and I absolutely love the Taj feature in bright orange. Poor birds, don’t respond well to having their colour stripped. An interesting exercise xx

    • Sarah Wilkie

      Thank you Jo 🙂 This is such a subjective exercise – Margaret thought the birds worked well and I’m inclined to agree with her, although the colour ones probably edge it. I also felt the Taj one worked in both versions, but I was less happy with the Lagarta Lodge sunset and most of the flowers.

  • Alison

    Interesting topic Sarah. I thought the objects like boats buildings and people work well in black and white, even the sunset. Birds and flowers are a difficult one, especially birds as they have such beautiful colouring. Anyway another great gallery

    • Sarah Wilkie

      Thank you Alison, I was interested to hear which ones you felt worked 🙂 I agree about the boat and the people, probably the building too. I wasn’t especially happy with the Lagarta sunset but the Chitwan NP one worked better, I felt.

  • Sue

    An interesting exercise, this, and the monochrome conversion succeeds well in some of the shots giving an impression of vibrancy

  • margaret21

    I think the portraits – whether of people or birds are successful in black and white, and hold up well against their colour originals. Also the architecture, boat etc. The flower ARE interesting, and I enjoyed noticing their textures more clearly, but yes, flowers like a bit of Glorious Technicolor, don’t they? But this is a lovely selection. Thanks Sarah.

    • Sarah Wilkie

      Many thanks for the considered comment Margaret 😊 I agree about the portraits of people – any face with a bit of character will look good in black and white. And these particular bird shots I think work well, though others I tried did not. I was happy with the boat too, because it has such a strong shape. Maybe the header flower is OK too, because of the raindrops? The others less so, and I only felt one of the sunsets was successful (the one with the boatmen silhouetted). Thank you for such an interesting challenge theme!

Do share your thoughts, I'd love to hear from you! And please include your name in case WP marks you 'anonymous' - thank you